Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Healthcare sector from the last 12 months.
Final Healthcare decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 48 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
The claimant succeeded on two sexual harassment claims but all other claims were dismissed.
Reference: 6014383/2025
All claims dismissed because they were presented outside the applicable time limit.
Reference: 6033424/2025
The claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the three-month time limit and the claimant failed to show it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time.
Reference: 6006571/2026
All claims were dismissed: unfair dismissal upon withdrawal, and the discrimination and harassment claims were out of time.
Reference: 6017618/2025
The claim was dismissed because it was presented out of time and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, meaning the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Reference: 2300861/2026
The claimant succeeded on constructive unfair dismissal and discrimination arising from disability, but failed on direct age discrimination; the reasonable adjustments claim was withdrawn.
Reference: 2412235/2023
The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and the tribunal could not proceed fairly in her absence.
Reference: 6015639/2025
All claims (unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and disability discrimination) were dismissed, with the unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims failing on their merits and the discrimination claim struck out for being out of time.
Reference: 3302486/2024
All claims dismissed as the claimant and her daughter were found not to be disabled, and the time-off claim failed.
Reference: 6023106/2024
The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim succeeded because the employer fundamentally breached the implied term of trust and confidence and the resignation was in response to that breach.
Reference: 3300530/2025
All claims under the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed on their merits; the Tribunal found no breach of duty.
Reference: 2401460/2024
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing, and the postponement application was refused for lack of supporting evidence and exceptional circumstances.
Reference: 2306335/2023
The claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, wages, and race harassment were dismissed, while some allegations of disability discrimination and harassment succeeded, with remedy to be determined.
Reference: 1403192/2024
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to comply with a case management order and a further order requiring her to accept the list of issues, making a fair trial impossible.
Reference: 2302288/2022
All of the claimant's discrimination and harassment claims were dismissed as not well-founded after a full merits hearing, with the tribunal finding that the respondent's actions were not discriminatory and were justified by legitimate patient safety concerns.
Reference: 3300427/2022
The claim was dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to late presentation; it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time.
Reference: 2600176/2026
The claim was dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the claim was lodged 9 months before the alleged dismissal.
Reference: 6045969/2025
The tribunal found the respondent acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant for misconduct after a fair investigation and process.
Reference: 3301579/2025
The claimant succeeded on her constructive unfair dismissal claim but lost on all discrimination claims.
Reference: 2407290/2024
The claimant failed to prove she was a disabled person at the material time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the discrimination claim.
Reference: 3201092/2024
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £86,142.96 as gross compensation for pension losses, so the claimant succeeded in obtaining that remedy.
Reference: 6019332/2024
The only final outcomes are the strike-out of the harassment claim and the dismissal of several claims upon withdrawal; no substantive merits determination was made on the remaining claims.
Reference: 3301421/2024
All claims were dismissed or struck out; the claimant did not succeed on any claim.
Reference: 6002805/2026
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 6014350/2024
The claimant's claims were struck out because he lacked the two years' qualifying service, had resigned (not constructive dismissal), failed to comply with orders, and did not attend the hearing.
Reference: 6031499/2025
The Tribunal dismissed all claims of race discrimination and harassment, finding that the treatment complained of was not because of race and that the respondents had provided credible non-discriminatory explanations.
Reference: 8002048/2025
All claims (unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and race discrimination) were dismissed because they were presented out of time and no extension was granted.
Reference: 1401894/2025
The claimant's reconsideration application was refused because withdrawal of a claim is not a judgment and cannot be reconsidered; the original claim was withdrawn and dismissed.
Reference: 6007512/2024
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed, but his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded regarding work on 7th November 2024.
Reference: 6024134/2025
All complaints were dismissed as not well founded after a full merits hearing.
Reference: 2404864/2024
The claim failed because the Band 8d job evaluation outcome did not create a contractual entitlement: the requisite signatories (line manager, budget holder and DDO) did not approve the form, so there was no valid contractual variation.
Reference: 6037829/2025
The claimant succeeded on three victimisation claims but failed on other discrimination, harassment, and most wage deduction claims, with no monetary award made at this liability stage.
Reference: 2302173/2023
The claimant succeeded on two specific victimisation detriments but lost on all other claims, with the wages claim for unpaid annual leave on termination still undetermined.
Reference: 2409234/2023
All claims were either withdrawn or dismissed on their merits; the sole well-founded s.15 claim was dismissed as out of time, so the claimant achieved no substantive success.
Reference: 2408690/2023
The claimant succeeded in his claim for unpaid wages as a worker under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Reference: 8003210/2025
The tribunal dismissed the negligent misstatement complaint because it fell outside the types of complaints Parliament has empowered the tribunal to decide.
Reference: 1600235/2026
The claim was struck out and dismissed because the claimant did not attend the final hearing and failed to comply with a tribunal order.
Reference: 6012771/2025
All claims were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal.
Reference: 6007854/2024
The Tribunal struck out claims of negligence and breach of health and safety legislation for lack of jurisdiction, allowed partial amendment of the claim, and refused other amendments; the substantive claims of harassment, reasonable adjustments, and indirect discrimination remain to be determined.
Reference: 3300526/2025
Both claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were dismissed as not well founded.
Reference: 6019505/2025
The claimant succeeded on claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, and constructive unfair dismissal, but her redundancy claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
Reference: 2407343/2024
The respondent failed to pay the claimant for all hours worked, fuel allowance, and holiday pay, and did not provide a written statement of particulars, resulting in total compensation of £8,346.80.
Reference: 6038541/2025
The first claimant was unfairly dismissed, and both claimants succeeded in their harassment claim, but their alternative direct discrimination claim was dismissed.
Reference: 1603346/2025
The claimant's complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed after a full merits hearing.
Reference: 6009627/2024
The claimant's claims under Working Time Regulations were struck out for no reasonable prospects, and his religion/belief discrimination and Health and Safety claims were withdrawn, while other claims remain pending.
Reference: 2307277/2025
The claimant was not a disabled person at the material time, so his disability discrimination claims were dismissed.
Reference: 1806083/2025
The claimant's claims for breach of contract, unfair dismissal, and unauthorised deductions were all upheld, with compensation awarded for each.
Reference: 2501339/2024
All three complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 2301943/2024