Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Construction sector from the last 12 months.
Final Construction decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 9 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
The claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
Reference: 3303494/2025
The tribunal dismissed all three claims, finding the dismissal fair, the claimant guilty of gross misconduct, and no entitlement to notice pay or unpaid wages.
Reference: 6005978/2026
The employer acted reasonably in treating the claimant's gross misconduct as a sufficient reason for dismissal, and the decision fell within the band of reasonable responses.
Reference: 8000576/2026
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to satisfy the tribunal that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the statutory time limit, and the late refiled claim was not within a reasonable period.
Reference: 4100013/2026
The respondent failed to respond to the claim, leading to a default judgment; the claims were well founded and awards made.
Reference: 6044603/2025
The claimant was not a disabled person at the material time because the impairment (stress and anxiety) was not likely to last 12 months when assessed from the standpoint of February 2026.
Reference: 4100077/2026
The complaint of unauthorised deductions was well-founded but the respondent had already repaid the deducted amount, so no further compensation was awarded.
Reference: 6024162/2025
The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded agreed compensation.
Reference: 8000293/2026
The Tribunal found the complaint well-founded and made a protective award of 90 days' remuneration.
Reference: 8000658/2026