Aberdeen Employment Tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Aberdeen.

Recent cases
10
Employers (last 3 months)
10
Recorded awards (last 3 months)
5

£43,622.85 combined

Published decisions

Cases from the last three months

Newest decisions first

28 Aug 2026
Claim dismissed

Whistleblowing

Employer: Granite Elite Ltd

The Tribunal found that none of the claimant's communications amounted to protected disclosures, and even if they had, the alleged detriments were not caused by them, so all claims were dismissed.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the claimant made protected disclosures under sections 43A and 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996
  • whether he was subjected to detriments under section 47B
  • the distinction between disclosure of information and mere allegations
  • the requirement for reasonable belief in the public interest
  • causation between disclosures and alleged detriments

Reference: 8000608/2026

19 Aug 2026
Outcome unclear

Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Employer: Langstane Housing Association Ltd

The Tribunal found that the claimant has a disability and made a protected disclosure, but these are preliminary determinations only; the substantive claims have not been finally decided.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Definition of disability under section 6(1) Equality Act 2010 – substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities
  • definition of qualifying disclosure under section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996 – disclosure of information
  • public interest and reasonable belief

Reference: 8001815/2025

19 Aug 2026
Claimant won£19,189.83 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Unpaid Wages, Whistleblowing, Breach of Contract and Other

Employer: Colins Tyres

The claimant was dismissed and subjected to detriments because he made protected disclosures about health and safety risks, and the respondent also failed to pay wages and provide statutory contractual rights.

Legal Issues (6)
  • Protected disclosures under section 43A ERA
  • automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A
  • detriment under section 47B
  • unlawful deduction from wages
  • breach of contract for notice
  • failure to provide written statement of particulars and payslips

Reference: 4100639/2026

18 Aug 2026
Dismissed on jurisdiction

Unfair Dismissal and Unpaid Wages

Employer: Wood Group UK Ltd

The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to satisfy the tribunal that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the statutory time limit, and the late refiled claim was not within a reasonable period.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Whether it was not reasonably practicable to present the unfair dismissal claim within the three-month time limit
  • whether the claim was presented within a reasonable period thereafter
  • effect of an error in the respondent's name on the claim form

Reference: 4100013/2026

14 Aug 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination

Employer: Stena Drilling PTE Ltd

The race discrimination claims were dismissed because the claimant did not establish primary facts from which race discrimination could be inferred, and the respondent's reasons for preferring the comparator were not shown to be race-motivated.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Whether the claimant proved primary facts from which race discrimination could be inferred under section 136 Equality Act 2010
  • burden of proof
  • comparator analysis
  • whether unreasonable treatment alone can support an inference of discrimination

Reference: 8001901/2024

28 Jul 2026
Mixed outcome

Discrimination and Harassment

Employer: Greene King Ltd

The claimant failed to prove she was disabled during the relevant period, so her disability discrimination claim was dismissed; the sexual harassment claim remains undetermined.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Definition of disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010
  • burden of proof on claimant
  • requirement for substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities
  • distinction between mental impairment and normal reaction to stress

Reference: 4103805/2025

21 Jul 2026
Mixed outcome£3,165.94 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Employer: Greymate Care Ltd

Unfair dismissal claim succeeded but wages and breach of contract claims dismissed; award reduced by 80% for contributory fault and Polkey, then uplifted 15% for ACAS Code breach.

Legal Issues (7)
  • Reason for dismissal
  • fairness under s.98(4)
  • Burchell test
  • contributory fault
  • Polkey reduction
  • ACAS Code uplift
  • mitigation of loss

Reference: 8002788/2025

20 Jul 2026
Claimant won£11,133.88 awarded

Unfair Dismissal and Breach of Contract

Employer: J Law Ltd

The dismissal was unfair due to a complete lack of procedural fairness, and the employer failed to prove gross misconduct, entitling the claimant to notice pay.

Legal Issues (6)
  • Fairness of dismissal under s.98(4) ERA 1996
  • adequacy of investigation
  • gross misconduct and repudiatory breach
  • contributory fault
  • mitigation of loss
  • ACAS Code uplift

Reference: 4103932/2025

17 Jul 2026
Mixed outcome£2,846.25 awarded

Redundancy Pay and Breach of Contract

Employer: Campsie Retail Ltd

Claimant awarded statutory redundancy payment but breach of contract claim dismissed as out of time.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Whether the respondent was the employer throughout
  • whether redundancy was the reason for dismissal
  • whether the breach of contract claim was time-barred

Reference: 8002465/2025

8 Jul 2026
Claimant won£7,286.95 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract and Other

Employer: Ayian Ltd

The dismissal was procedurally unfair because the respondent failed to give warnings or a chance to improve, making it outside the range of reasonable responses.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Continuity of employment under TUPE
  • fairness of capability dismissal
  • application of Polkey reduction
  • ACAS Code uplift
  • wrongful dismissal notice entitlement

Reference: 8002805/2025

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.