Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Bury St Edmunds.
£5,649.68 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Monolith UK Ltd
All claims were struck out due to non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claims.
Reference: 3303832/2024
Employer: Dr R Wadhwani
All claims (unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and disability discrimination) were dismissed, with the unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims failing on their merits and the discrimination claim struck out for being out of time.
Reference: 3302486/2024
Employer: MacIntyre Care Ltd
The tribunal found the respondent acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant for misconduct after a fair investigation and process.
Reference: 3301579/2025
Employer: The Land Restoration Trust
The case is ongoing; preliminary hearings and strike-outs have dismissed some discrimination claims, but the whistleblowing and other claims remain undetermined, so no final win/loss overall.
Reference: 3306483/2024
Employer: Farsight Security Services Ltd
The respondent admitted liability for the unauthorised deductions claim and the tribunal ordered payment of the admitted amount.
Reference: 6025039/2025
Employer: The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge and Others
The Claimant succeeded on 11 out of 14 detriment complaints for whistleblowing, but the claim is not yet complete as a remedy hearing is pending.
Reference: 3307960/2023
Employer: IJ
No substantive determination of the main claim; claims against individual respondents were withdrawn and dismissed.
Reference: 3306573/2024
Employer: Alchemie Technology Ltd
The unfair dismissal and whistleblowing claims were struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success, while the wrongful dismissal claim remains undetermined.
Reference: 6028421/2025
Employer: Cinch Cars Ltd
All claims were dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person under s.6 Equality Act 2010 and the itemised pay statement claim failed.
Reference: 3302011/2025
Employer: Impact Business Shared Services Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
The respondent failed to present a valid response and defaulted, and later failed to attend the hearing, leading to all claims being upheld.
Reference: 6021677/2024
Employer: Centralised Sales Leadership Ltd (in Creditors voluntary liquidation)
All claims remaining against the respondent were dismissed by the Employment Tribunal.
Reference: 6012923/2024
Employer: Registered Office (UK) Ltd
The claim was struck out under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 due to the claimant's non-appearance and failure to prosecute.
Reference: 3302575/2025
Employer: L Biggs and S Biggs For M Biggs
The claimant failed to demonstrate that the proposed shift change put her at a substantial disadvantage by reason of her disabilities, so the claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed.
Reference: 3310814/2024
Employer: Arc Hospitality Recruitment Solutions Ltd and Wembley National Stadium Ltd
The claimant lost all claims: the first respondent lacked knowledge of disability and the challenged acts were not because of disability, while the second respondent was not a principal/agent/employer and the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
Reference: 6009133/2024
Employer: GXO Logistics UK Ltd
All claims struck out as scandalous/vexatious and having no reasonable prospect of success, with many subject to issue estoppel from previous judgments.
Reference: 6016718/2025
Employer: Milton Keynes College
The claim was dismissed in full because the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and had persistently failed to comply with Tribunal directions, making a fair hearing impossible.
Reference: 6020696/2025
Employer: Bridge Academy
The claim of race discrimination was not presented within the applicable time limit, but it is just and equitable to extend the time limit, so the claim will proceed.
Reference: 6003113/2025
Employer: ARJ Construction Ltd (In creditors voluntary liquidation)
The Employment Tribunal found that the respondent failed to consult 20 or more employees as required by s.188 TULRCA and made a protective award of 90 days.
Reference: 2305631/2024
Employer: Forage and Season Group Ltd and Forage and Season Core Ltd
Claimants succeeded on unauthorised deductions but lost on automatic unfair dismissal and breach of contract, resulting in a split outcome.
Reference: 6015371/2025
Employer: Waterstones Booksellers Ltd
All claims were dismissed: the whistleblowing claim was struck out as out of time, and the remaining claims of unfair dismissal (including constructive dismissal), harassment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and unlawful deduction from wages were found not well founded on the merits.
Reference: 3314213/2023
Employer: GXO Logistics UK Ltd
The claimant succeeded only on one of several reasonable adjustment complaints; all other claims were dismissed.
Reference: 3305178/2023
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.