Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Cambridge.
£18,277.80 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Valhalla Network Ltd and Others
The judgment is a preliminary hearing dealing with case management issues; no claims have been finally determined.
Reference: 6028303/2025
Employer: Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Trust
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 6014350/2024
Employer: Isaac Creative Hair Ltd
The claimant succeeded on procedural unfair dismissal but all other claims (discrimination, harassment, victimisation, wages, holiday pay) were dismissed.
Reference: 3306077/2023
Employer: Tilkis Ltd T/a “Tuck in Turkish Restaurant”
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing without explanation, and the tribunal was satisfied that dismissal was appropriate given the history of non-attendance and non-compliance.
Reference: 6025176/2025
Employer: Pets At Home Ltd
The claimant succeeded on her reasonable adjustments claims but failed on direct discrimination; holiday pay was withdrawn, resulting in a split outcome.
Reference: 3303577/2024
Employer: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
The claimant was not an employee within the meaning of s.230 ERA 1996, so all claims failed and were dismissed.
Reference: 6028208/2025
Employer: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
All claims were dismissed because the claimant was not an employee within the meaning of s.230 ERA 1996.
Reference: 6028211/2025
Employer: Bank of Baroda UK Ltd
The tribunal found that the ESA was expressly incorporated into the claimants' contracts through the reference to the RPA in their appointment letters, and that the ESA's enhanced redundancy pay clause (4 weeks per year of service) was a contractual entitlement.
Reference: 3306622/2024
Employer: North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust
The complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 3311470/2024
Employer: Norfolk County Council
The claimant's claims were dismissed or struck out because they were out of time or because the claimant lacked the required two years' continuous service.
Reference: 6012287/2025
Employer: Racesafe Ltd and others
The claims were dismissed because the first respondent lacked actual or constructive knowledge of the claimant's disability, the third respondent did not terminate her employment, and the reasonable adjustments claim failed as the offered adjustments were reasonable.
Reference: 3320575/2021
Employer: Festimed Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
All claims struck out because the respondent company was dissolved, leaving the tribunal without jurisdiction.
Reference: 6001452/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.