Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London East.
£411,343.13 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: RiverSafe Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claimant was not owed commission for revenue not recognised at the date of termination, and dismissed both claims.
Reference: 6017364/2025
Employer: P&A Hydraulics Ltd
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay wages, notice pay, and redundancy payments as required by law, and awarded the full amounts claimed.
Reference: 3201009/2025
Employer: HR & OD Business Solutions Ltd 'in voluntary liquidation'
The respondent failed to respond or attend, and the claimant's unchallenged evidence proved non-payment of wages and expenses.
Reference: 3200931/2025
Employer: Mrs M Wendorff-Kowalczuk and Dell Medical Centre
The claimant failed to prove she was a disabled person at the material time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the discrimination claim.
Reference: 3201092/2024
Employer: Arriva Kent Thameside Ltd
All claims were dismissed because the claimant failed to establish protected disclosures, discrimination, or any unlawful treatment; some claims were also barred by a prior settlement agreement.
Reference: 6014056/2024
Employer: Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd
The claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders and did not attend the hearing, leading to strikeout of the entire claim.
Reference: 6017080/2025
Employer: BGC Partners LP and others
The entirety of the claimant's claims were struck out as having been presented outside the relevant statutory time limits and having no reasonable prospect of success.
Reference: 3200408/2025
Employer: Goji Administration Services Ltd and Euroclear SA/NV
The commission structure lacked sufficient certainty to render any sum quantifiable as properly payable, and the post-termination restriction precluded entitlement in any event.
Reference: 3201735/2023
Employer: Sansum Solutions Group Ltd
The complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract (dismissal without notice) succeeded; the holiday pay claim was withdrawn after payment.
Reference: 6025878/2025
Employer: Leidos Industrial Engineers Ltd
The claimant won his constructive unfair dismissal claim because the respondent's flawed disciplinary process, trumped-up charges, and unfair final written warning cumulatively breached the implied term of trust and confidence, but lost his whistleblowing claims because the protected disclosure did not materially influence the respondent's actions.
Reference: 3205717/2022
Employer: DPD Group UK Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claimant was a self-employed franchisee, not an employee or worker, and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claims; the entire case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.
Reference: 3201090/2024
Employer: Property Partners Management Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing without a satisfactory explanation, and his non-attendance was found to be deliberate and contumelious.
Reference: 6031650/2025
Employer: Secretary of State for Business and Trade and Paxman Joineries Ltd (In Liquidation)
The Tribunal found that the claimants were not TUPE transferred, remained employed until redundancy dismissal, and are entitled to seek redundancy payment and notice pay from the first respondent.
Reference: 3200157/2025
Employer: My Lahore Birmingham Ltd and AF Restaurants Ltd
All claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success or the claimants failed to comply with orders to properly particularise their claims.
Reference: 3205774/2022
Employer: London Borough of Newham
The claim was struck out because there was no reasonable prospect of success; the dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses given the repeated security breaches and a live final written warning.
Reference: 6003348/2024
Employer: Pinnacle Finance and Property Group Ltd
The claim for unauthorised deductions was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the deducted sums.
Reference: 6030428/2025
Employer: Care Premium Ltd
The claimant succeeded in proving that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay holiday pay, and the claim was allowed despite being out of time due to reasonable practicability.
Reference: 3201472/2024
Employer: Royal Mail Group Ltd
The claimant succeeded on claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and one reasonable adjustment claim, but lost on victimisation, indirect discrimination, and other reasonable adjustment complaints, resulting in a split overall outcome.
Reference: 3201571/2023
Employer: Silverman Opticians Ltd
Claimant won on victimisation (bonus withdrawal) and section 38 claim but lost on direct discrimination, harassment and unfair dismissal.
Reference: 3200344/2023
Employer: Ms L Cutmore and Ms P Hinton
The claim was dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing and the Tribunal considered the claim abandoned due to the withdrawal of a related claim.
Reference: 6011285/2025
Employer: BioTalent Ltd and Investigo Ltd
All claims were dismissed on the merits.
Reference: 3201144/2025
Employer: ACG Care Ltd
The claimant succeeded in both claims; the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages and breached the employment contract, resulting in a total award of £7,534.06.
Reference: 3200140/2024
Employer: Group Momentum Ltd (T/a Headline Hairdressing)
The tribunal found that the claimants were unfairly dismissed contrary to section 152(1)(a) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and awarded compensation.
Reference: 3200076/2026
Employer: Compassion Homes Ltd
Unfair dismissal claim dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; wages claim succeeded by consent.
Reference: 6044252/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.