Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£462,404.18 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Department of Work and Pensions
All claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed by the Tribunal.
Reference: 6020902/2024
Employer: Media Stream AI Ltd
The tribunal found both claims well-founded and awarded the claimant £24,068.98 in total.
Reference: 6006748/2026
Employer: Ringway Hounslow Highway Ltd
All claims were unsuccessful: age discrimination and harassment claims struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, and the victimisation claim was dismissed on the merits.
Reference: 6006553/2025
Employer: Cleanco Cleaning Services Ltd
The claimant succeeded in part: holiday pay, employer pension contributions and failure to provide written statement claims were upheld, but the claim for unpaid overtime was dismissed.
Reference: 6036295/2025
Employer: Secretary of State for Justice
The claim was dismissed as not well founded.
Reference: 2306823/2023
Employer: The London Borough of Croydon
All claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination (including direct discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and victimisation), and harassment were dismissed after a full merits hearing.
Reference: 6005496/2024
Employer: Tesco Stores Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed (lost) but the wrongful dismissal claim succeeded (won), resulting in a split outcome.
Reference: 2309092/2024
Employer: East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
The claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the three-month time limit and the claimant failed to show it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time.
Reference: 6006571/2026
Employer: Wickes Building Supplies Ltd
The claim was struck out because the claimant lacked the requisite two years' continuous service for an unfair dismissal claim, the claim was presented significantly out of time, and the claimant failed to actively pursue the claim or comply with case management directions.
Reference: 6012922/2025
Employer: TB Kitchen and Bar Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time.
Reference: 6035106/2025
Employer: South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust
The claim was dismissed because it was presented out of time and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, meaning the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Reference: 2300861/2026
Employer: London Ambulance Service NHS Trust
All of the claimant's claims were struck out.
Reference: 6004706/2026
Employer: University of Kent
The tribunal partially struck out some whistleblowing and victimisation claims for non-compliance, while leaving other claims pending.
Reference: 6018012/2024
Employer: John Lewis plc
The claimant was fairly dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and failed on its merits.
Reference: 6010495/2025
Employer: Pharma Targeting Ltd
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all claims and ordered the respondent to pay the specified amounts.
Reference: 6004492/2026
Employer: Home Office and Others
The claimant's claims were dismissed because he failed to attend the preliminary hearing without adequate explanation, constituting a deliberate and disrespectful disregard of tribunal procedures.
Reference: 6007641/2025
Employer: RCB Healthcare Group and Mrs M Butland
All claims dismissed as the claimant and her daughter were found not to be disabled, and the time-off claim failed.
Reference: 6023106/2024
Employer: Positive Pub Group Ltd
The respondent failed to respond, and the tribunal found the claims well-founded, ordering payment of £240.30 gross.
Reference: 6012130/2026
Employer: ABM Facility Services UK Ltd
The Tribunal dismissed the claims, finding that the Respondent's dismissal was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, and that the Respondent had not failed to make reasonable adjustments as no suitable adjustments were available.
Reference: 6009892/2024
Employer: Aramark Defence Services Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
Reference: 6003925/2025
Employer: RPC Land & New Homes Ltd
The Tribunal found no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and therefore no constructive dismissal, so both claims were dismissed on the merits.
Reference: 6006060/2024
Employer: Ingeus UK Ltd
The claimant's remaining discrimination complaints were struck out because she failed to pay the deposit ordered by the Tribunal.
Reference: 6001065/2025
Employer: Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Trust and Others
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to comply with a case management order and a further order requiring her to accept the list of issues, making a fair trial impossible.
Reference: 2302288/2022
Employer: Kew College
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal, notice pay, arrears of pay and public interest disclosure detriment claims as out of time, but allowed the race discrimination and harassment claims to proceed to a final hearing.
Reference: 6019888/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.