The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders and conducted proceedings unreasonably, making a fair trial impossible.
Legal Issues (4)
Strike out under Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(b) (unreasonable conduct) and (c) (failure to comply with an order)
All claims succeeded because the respondent failed to attend or respond, and the Tribunal was satisfied that the claimant's complaints were well-founded.
Legal Issues (2)
Default judgment
claims succeeded in the absence of the respondent. The Tribunal assessed compensation based on the claimant's evidence
The claimant won claims for unauthorised deductions, redundancy payment, and holiday pay against the first respondent via default judgment, but lost all claims against the other four respondents due to lack of employment relationship, while other claims against the first respondent remain stayed.
Legal Issues (7)
Jurisdiction over multiple respondents
TUPE transfers
default judgment under rule 22
stay of proceedings due to liquidation (section 130 Insolvency Act 1986)
Mrs Jackaman won all her claims (wages, breach of contract, redundancy) with total awards of £6,867.00, but the claims of the first, sixth and seventh claimants were struck out.