Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Watford.
£384,436.42 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Lumora Ltd T/a Erba Molecular
The claimant succeeded in his claim for unlawful deduction of wages because the bonus was contractual and the respondent failed to pay the full amount due.
Reference: 3314474/2023
Employer: HM Prison and Probation Service
All claims were dismissed as not well-founded or lacking jurisdiction.
Reference: 6027838/2025
Employer: Fort Engineering Ltd
The claimant won because the respondent dismissed her while she was on maternity leave, which was automatically unfair and discriminatory, and also failed to pay her contractual and statutory entitlements.
Reference: 3313227/2023
Employer: TRGB Ltd
The claimant lost the constructive unfair dismissal claim because there was no repudiatory breach of contract, but won the holiday pay claim on liability (unauthorised deductions) with remedy to be determined.
Reference: 3306067/2024
Employer: E & J Gallo Winery Europe
The claimant was not dismissed by the respondent, so the unfair dismissal claim failed.
Reference: 6028150/2025
Employer: Connells Residential
The discrimination claim was dismissed as out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time; the constructive unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn due to lack of jurisdiction.
Reference: 6010762/2025
Employer: Buckinghamshire Council
The claimant's applications to strike out the respondent's response and to amend the claim were both refused. The underlying discrimination claims remain pending, and the unfair dismissal claim was previously withdrawn.
Reference: 3313566/2023
Employer: Camden Community Football and Sports Association
The claimants succeeded on detriment claims under the National Minimum Wage Act but failed on other claims due to time limits and lack of entitlement to wages.
Reference: 3300691/2023
Employer: Peacock Taverns Ltd
The claimant succeeded in all claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, breach of contract for notice and expenses.
Reference: 6032235/2025
Employer: eBay (UK) Ltd
All claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success, primarily due to being out of time and the claimant failing to establish a just and equitable extension.
Reference: 6018467/2024
Employer: Orchardside School
The claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing that the discriminatory conduct extended over a period ending on or after 27 August 2024, nor that it would be just and equitable to extend the time limit, so the claims were struck out.
Reference: 6002234/2025
Employer: Quack Recruitment and Training Ltd
The complaints relating to breach of contract and wrongful dismissal were not well-founded because the respondent did not breach the employment contract.
Reference: 6004316/2025
Employer: Sullivan Bus and Coach Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) and others
The tribunal found that the employer failed to consult under TULRCA, unfairly dismissed some employees for redundancy, made unlawful deductions from wages, and breached contract for notice pay, while other claims were withdrawn or struck out, and some remain undetermined for a separate list of claimants.
Reference: 3302830/2025
Employer: University of Hertfordshire
The claimant's second claim was partially struck out as an abuse of process for re-litigating matters already decided or capable of being raised in earlier proceedings, while other allegations were allowed to proceed.
Reference: 6018120/2025
Employer: UK Training and Development Ltd
All complaints were dismissed as not well-founded after a full hearing on liability and remedy.
Reference: 3311044/2023
Employer: Hornsey Lane Estate Community Association
Claimant did not attend the hearing and the claim was dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Reference: 6020889/2025
Employer: London Borough of Brent
The tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the relationship between a foster carer and a local authority is not contractual, as established by binding Court of Appeal authority in W v Essex County Council.
Reference: 6022668/2024
Employer: Landscape Avenue Ltd
The entire claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules.
Reference: 6022852/2024
Employer: Greater London Cradles Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
The claimant succeeded on some protected disclosure detriment claims (awarded £2,900) but lost on unfair dismissal and other detriment complaints.
Reference: 6000278/2025
Employer: West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
The race and age discrimination claims were dismissed as out of time, but the constructive unfair dismissal claim was allowed to proceed.
Reference: 6022815/2025
Employer: The Brothers Supper Ltd and S Clarke and A Clarke T/a The Shoulder of Mutton
All claims were dismissed because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the claimant was not an employee or worker.
Reference: 6015981/2025
Employer: AMC Installations Ltd
The tribunal found that the dismissal was for a fair reason (redundancy) and that the process, although short, was within the range of reasonable responses given the small size of the employer and the pool of one.
Reference: 3300859/2025
Employer: Dorchester Heating Solutions Ltd
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not have at least two years' continuous service, which is a jurisdictional requirement for bringing an unfair dismissal claim.
Reference: 3303531/2025
Employer: Moneytrans UK Ltd and C.-H. Springuel
Claimant succeeded against first respondent for unpaid wages, redundancy, and holiday pay; claim against second respondent dismissed as not employer.
Reference: 3304517/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.