18 Sept 2026
Claim dismissed
Reference: 2306823/2023
Secretary of State for Justice employment tribunal cases
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Secretary of State for Justice.
- Cases (last 2 years)
- 47
- Tribunal locations (last 2 years)
- 18
- Recorded awards (last 2 years)
- 5
£101,926.72 combined
Published decisions
Five most recent decisions
Newest decisions first
27 Aug 2026
Claim struck out
Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination
Heard at London South
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service, and the discrimination claims were allowed to proceed after time limit extension.
Legal Issues (2)
- Qualifying service for unfair dismissal (s.108 ERA 1996)
- time limits for discrimination claims (s.15 and s.20/21 Equality Act 2010) and just and equitable extension
Reference: 2300124/2025
21 Aug 2026
Claim dismissed
Unfair Dismissal
The Tribunal found the respondent had a genuine belief in the claimant's misconduct, reasonable grounds based on multiple witness accounts, a reasonable investigation despite some delay, and that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses.
Legal Issues (3)
- Whether the respondent had a genuine belief in misconduct
- reasonable grounds for that belief
- carried out a reasonable investigation (Burchell test). Whether dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses. Whether the claimant was treated inconsistently compared to other employees
Reference: 6018279/2025
4 Aug 2026
Claim struck out
Discrimination
Heard at Bristol
The Claimant failed to prove that her impairments of ILO, DBPD, asthma, and GORD had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities.
Legal Issues (6)
- Definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010
- substantial adverse effect
- long-term effect
- credibility of claimant's evidence
- weight of medical records
- burden of proof
Reference: 6029870/2025
4 Aug 2026
Claim struck out
Discrimination
Heard at Watford
The first claimant's indirect discrimination claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success, and her application to add a victimisation claim was refused.
Legal Issues (4)
- Application to amend under Rule 30 and Selkent principles
- definition of protected act under s.27 Equality Act 2010
- strike out for no reasonable prospects
- balance of hardship and prejudice
Reference: 3300929/2024
Pro case research
Need more cases or more precise results?
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.