Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Manchester.
£349,127.07 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: National Crime Agency
All claims were dismissed as not well founded.
Reference: 6007564/2024
Employer: Ms J Gamble-Flowers and Salford City College Group
All claims failed on their merits after a full hearing; the Tribunal found no unlawful discrimination, harassment, victimisation, equal pay breach, or whistleblowing detriment.
Reference: 2401162/2023
Employer: Calibre Conservation
The Tribunal dismissed all claims for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant was not an employee or worker.
Reference: 6020301/2024
Employer: PVTEC Ltd
The respondent failed to pay the claimant's full wages, notice pay, and accrued holiday pay, and the tribunal found all three claims well-founded.
Reference: 2401723/2025
Employer: Crafty Pig Designs Ltd (In voluntary liquidation) and Secretary Of State For Business And Trade
All claims were dismissed as not well-founded after a final hearing.
Reference: 2404376/2025
Employer: Belle Vue Manchester Ltd
The claimant lost the wages claim because the deductions were lawful under a statutory exception, but won the itemised pay statements claim, though no monetary award was made.
Reference: 6047918/2025
Employer: Intesa Communications Ltd
Respondent failed to present a valid response, leading to default judgment in favour of the claimant on both wages and breach of contract claims.
Reference: 6043315/2025
Employer: Printstat Ltd
The respondent failed to respond and the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,131.00.
Reference: 6035057/2025
Employer: Brinton Healthcare UK Ltd and Others
No claim succeeded and no claims remain ongoing. Claim outcomes: wages: struck_out; breach_of_contract: struck_out.
Reference: 6036158/2025
Employer: Royal Mail Group Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the protected disclosure detriment claim but lost her disability discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal claims.
Reference: 2407434/2024
Employer: Pendle Support Ltd
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions totalling £321.70 from the claimant's wages, as the identity card had been returned, the notice period charge was unsupported by evidence of additional costs, and part of the training cost deduction exceeded the actual cost incurred.
Reference: 2406699/2025
Employer: Enso Leisure Trading Ltd
Respondent failed to respond and Legal Officer found unauthorised deductions and unpaid holiday pay.
Reference: 6032741/2025
Employer: Work with Vista Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the unlawful deduction of wages (commission) claim but lost on holiday pay and notice pay claims.
Reference: 6038011/2025
Employer: Amazon UK Services Ltd
All complaints of race discrimination, harassment, and victimisation were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success.
Reference: 6011827/2025
Employer: Herbprime Co Ltd
The claimant succeeded on both unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims, with no Polkey reduction or contributory fault, and a 25% ACAS uplift applied, but remedy is yet to be determined.
Reference: 2402185/2023
Employer: Extons Foods Ltd and Proman Supply Chain Ltd
All claims were dismissed: disability discrimination because the claimant was not disabled at the material time, and race discrimination and racial harassment because the Tribunal found no unlawful conduct on the merits.
Reference: 2400006/2023
Employer: The Secretary of State for Justice
The claimant won on two victimisation complaints but lost her s15 and reasonable adjustment claims, making the overall outcome split.
Reference: 6003749/2024
The claimant was not an employee of the first respondent, but an agency worker, and therefore not entitled to unpaid wages, holiday pay or a redundancy payment from the National Insurance Fund.
Reference: 6040796/2026
Employer: AJ&D Chapelhow (Cliburn) Ltd
The tribunal found the dismissal was by reason of genuine redundancy and that the employer followed a fair procedure, making the dismissal fair.
Reference: 6021400/2025
Employer: Whitbread Group plc
All three claims were dismissed on the merits: the claimant was not denied rest breaks, the employer made out the statutory defence to harassment, and there was no repudiatory breach causing the resignation.
Reference: 6008264/2024
Employer: The Commissioners for HM's Revenue and Customs
The claim of unfair dismissal was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction, and subsequently the entire claim was struck out for failure to actively pursue.
Reference: 6012395/2025
Employer: Habbibi Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) and Others
The claimant was awarded total compensation of £144,627.75 for discrimination and related claims, including injury to feelings, personal injury, aggravated damages, and financial losses.
Reference: 6018561/2024
Employer: Oaktree Support Services
The respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages by reducing her hours without the required written contractual notice.
Reference: 6042800/2025
Employer: E3 Associates Ltd
The claim for unlawful deduction from wages was found well founded because the respondent failed to attend and the judge accepted the claimant's evidence.
Reference: 6047426/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.