Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Newcastle.
£98,472.30 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Aspen Wolf Ltd
Both claims were dismissed (one upon withdrawal, the other on its merits), resulting in no success for the claimant.
Reference: 6016505/2026
Employer: N Storey
The tribunal found the claimant was a worker and awarded unpaid wages, resulting in a win for the claimant.
Reference: 6042712/2025
Employer: Blossom Homecare Ltd
All claims were dismissed: unfair dismissal upon withdrawal, and the discrimination and harassment claims were out of time.
Reference: 6017618/2025
Employer: Reprotec Group Ltd
The Tribunal found the claim of unfair constructive dismissal not well founded and dismissed it.
Reference: 6040500/2025
Employer: Humbledon and Plains Farm Workmen’s Club and Institute Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as out of time, but the statutory redundancy claim succeeded and the claimant was awarded £2,564.10.
Reference: 2501478/2025
Employer: Agelec Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Electrogenius Ltd
The tribunal found that the first claimant's notice pay and redundancy claims were not well-founded, but upheld the first claimant's annual leave claim and the second claimant's notice pay and redundancy claims, awarding damages and a redundancy payment.
Reference: 2500601/2025
Employer: Department for Work and Pensions
The claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and provided no explanation or engagement, leading to dismissal of all claims.
Reference: 6037529/2025
Employer: David Lloyd Leisure Ltd
The claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not engage with the tribunal, leading to dismissal of all claims under Rule 47.
Reference: 6012731/2025
Employer: G4S Facilities Management (UK) Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded.
Reference: 6029011/2025
Employer: Effective Security Services Ltd T/a Professional Security
The claimant won on unlawful deductions because rolled-up holiday pay was calculated on a below-minimum-wage basic rate, but lost all other claims because the cessation of shifts was due to an automatic right-to-work suspension, not a reaction to his complaints or disclosures.
Reference: 6019957/2024
Employer: Ground Control Ltd
The claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 6027678/2025
Employer: Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant's claims for breach of contract, unfair dismissal, and unauthorised deductions were all upheld, with compensation awarded for each.
Reference: 2501339/2024
Employer: Costain Ltd
All claims were either dismissed as not well founded or withdrawn by the claimant.
Reference: 2500538/2025
Employer: HSBC UK Bank plc
The claimant succeeded on one discrimination claim (failure to provide a printer) but failed on other discrimination and victimisation claims, and other claims were struck out.
Reference: 2500230/2025
Employer: Carsa Ltd
The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 6037395/2025
Employer: WORR Ltd
The claimant failed to prove any of his complaints (unfair dismissal, failure to make adjustments, discrimination arising from disability) were well-founded.
Reference: 2500539/2025
Employer: The Commissioners For HM’s Revenue and Customs
The claims of disability discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Reference: 6004215/2025
Employer: Ads Windows Ltd and Ace Windows (NE) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation)
The claimant's statutory redundancy pay claim was within time and will proceed, but the unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unlawful deduction claims were dismissed as out of time.
Reference: 6032659/2025
Employer: EFTEC Ltd
Claimant was not dismissed and age discrimination and harassment claims were not well-founded.
Reference: 6022052/2025
Employer: The Council of the City of Newcastle upon Tyne
All claims were either struck out or dismissed as not well founded.
Reference: 2500268/2024
Employer: Notch Durham
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of qualifying service, but the wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages (tips), and failure to provide written particulars claims all succeeded.
Reference: 6015161/2025
Employer: Security Defence Group Ltd
The claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and the respondent was ordered to pay £230.
Reference: 6014019/2024
Employer: Sureserve Compliance North Ltd
Ms Forster succeeded on her direct sex discrimination claim regarding suspension and failure to take her complaint seriously, but all other claims by both claimants were dismissed.
Reference: 2500476/2025
Employer: Rosen (UK) Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so.
Reference: 6042588/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.