Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Birmingham.
£94,285.60 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Small Heath Medical Practice
All claims dismissed because they were presented outside the applicable time limit.
Reference: 6033424/2025
Employer: Ocado Central Services Ltd
The claimant succeeded in part on reasonable adjustments claims but failed on the claim regarding the attendance management procedure, resulting in a split outcome and an award of £23,410.87.
Reference: 1305252/2024
Employer: Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant succeeded on two sexual harassment claims but all other claims were dismissed.
Reference: 6014383/2025
Employer: The Chief Constable of West Midlands Police
The tribunal held that judicial proceedings immunity applied to the decisions to dismiss the claimants, and that the EU law-based interpretation in P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis no longer applies after Brexit, so the claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Reference: 1303890/2025
Employer: Verisure Services (UK) Ltd
All claims dismissed; claimant was fairly dismissed, disability and wage claims dismissed as out of time or on merits, and breach of contract claim without jurisdiction.
Reference: 1308699/2023
Employer: Atwal (Midlands) Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation)
The claimant succeeded on her claim of constructive unfair dismissal, and the Tribunal found the dismissal was unfair under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, awarding a basic award of £3,120.
Reference: 6019133/2025
Employer: Alliance in Partnership Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing without providing a satisfactory reason.
Reference: 1303902/2025
Employer: University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
The claimant's reconsideration application was refused because withdrawal of a claim is not a judgment and cannot be reconsidered; the original claim was withdrawn and dismissed.
Reference: 6007512/2024
Employer: Tamworth Borough Council
All complaints were found not well-founded and dismissed.
Reference: 6021283/2024
Employer: R Rahman
The claim was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the sum claimed for unpaid wages.
Reference: 6009027/2024
Employer: Jaguar Land Rover Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded, and the respondent's justification defence succeeded in respect of the discrimination claim, leading to dismissal of all claims.
Reference: 1306036/2024
Employer: Moo Fresh Ltd
The claimant was unfairly dismissed because the respondent failed to establish a potentially fair reason for dismissal and the dismissal was procedurally unfair, lacking any proper process.
Reference: 6011799/2025
Employer: WSH Logistics Ltd (in Administration) and The Secretary of State for Business and Trade
The Tribunal granted a protective award after finding the respondent had failed to comply with its collective consultation obligations under section 188 TULR(C)A 1992.
Reference: 1300453/2026
Employer: Birmingham City Council
The claimants failed to show their work as Business Advisers was like work to that of Account Managers – the roles were materially different in content, responsibility and time allocation.
Reference: 1304212/2024
Employer: University of Wolverhampton
The Tribunal found that the respondent acted reasonably in treating redundancy as a sufficient reason for dismissal, and the dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses.
Reference: 6030814/2025
Employer: People Solutions Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of two years' service, and his discrimination claims were struck out because the respondent could not be held liable for the alleged acts of Autosmart employees; a holiday pay claim remains pending.
Reference: 6004258/2025
Employer: Elements Europe Ltd (in Administration) and Secretary of State for Business & Trade
The employer failed to conduct any collective consultation before dismissing 141 employees for redundancy, breaching section 188 TULCRA.
Reference: 1304080/2025
Employer: Bladon Jets (UK) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade
The tribunal found the respondent failed to consult on redundancies and ordered a protective award of 90 days' pay for each claimant; Mr G England's wages claims were withdrawn.
Reference: 1306983/2024
Employer: Secretary State
The claimant succeeded in having commission included in the calculation of redundancy and notice pay, but failed on her claim for arrears of commission.
Reference: 6012517/2025
Employer: HI Q Windows Ltd
The claimant succeeded on all three substantive complaints (unauthorised deductions, breach of contract for notice pay, and unfair dismissal) with the respondent ordered to pay compensation including ACAS uplifts.
Reference: 1303312/2024
Employer: UK Fuels Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of the required two years' service, and all other discrimination claims were dismissed as not well founded.
Reference: 1303342/2024
Employer: Circle Health Group Ltd
Claimant won unfair dismissal but lost other claims; compensation limited to basic award due to Polkey reduction.
Reference: 1306301/2024
Employer: A Moseley
The claimant succeeded in unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims but lost on holiday pay and withdrew age discrimination.
Reference: 1306018/2024
Employer: Cargo Marketing Services Ltd
The disability discrimination claims were found to be unfounded and dismissed.
Reference: 6002570/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.