Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£462,404.18 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: London Ambulance Service NHS Trust
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to lack of qualifying service, but the disability discrimination claims were allowed to proceed.
Reference: 6002895/2025
Employer: Sky In-Home Service Ltd
The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded on liability.
Reference: 6009728/2025
Employer: Lidl Ltd
The claimant's disability discrimination claim was dismissed/struck out because he was found not to be disabled, and his reconsideration application was refused.
Reference: 6009818/2024
Employer: Whiskey & Wealth Club Ltd
The claim was struck out because the Employment Tribunal did not have territorial jurisdiction to hear it.
Reference: 6046739/2025
The claimant was not an employee of Sixmen Limited at the material time, so her claims for redundancy pay and holiday pay were dismissed.
Reference: 6004854/2026
Employer: Southwark Council
The claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed.
Reference: 6009737/2025
Employer: Topaz Ltd
The claimant lost on all claims except for unlawful deductions from wages and failure to provide a written statement, for which she was awarded a total of £1,268.94.
Reference: 2301649/2024
Employer: Native Land Ltd
The claimant won on liability (unfair dismissal and wages) by default after the respondent's response was struck out, but the remedy judgment and costs order were set aside on reconsideration, so the final remedy is not yet determined.
Reference: 6022779/2024
Employer: Kingston University Service Company Ltd
The claimant failed to establish that his tinnitus and anxiety had a substantial adverse effect on his day-to-day activities, so he was not a disabled person under the Equality Act 2010, and his amendment applications were either withdrawn or refused.
Reference: 6005329/2024
Employer: Mr N W Humphrey (Acting by his Deputy Ms S Morris)
The claim was struck out because the claimant's conduct and inability to participate made a fair hearing within the trial window impossible, and a further postponement would cause disproportionate prejudice to the respondent.
Reference: 2303460/2022
Employer: Richmond Food & Supply Ltd and Others
The claimant succeeded against the employer on unpaid wages, holiday pay, notice pay and pension contributions, but the claims against the individual respondents were struck out as they were not the employer.
Reference: 6040979/2025
Employer: KPI Group Ltd
The respondent failed to attend the hearing and the claimant's claim was upheld.
Reference: 6027977/2025
Employer: Hurstmere School
All complaints were found not well-founded and were dismissed.
Reference: 2303124/2024
Employer: Harrods Ltd
The wrongful dismissal claim succeeded because four weeks of notice pay remained unpaid, while the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because Harrods had a genuine belief in misconduct following a reasonable investigation and dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses.
Reference: 6005182/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.